Law & Courts

A District’s Rule Against Misgendering Students Is Likely Constitutional

By Mark Walsh — July 30, 2024 4 min read
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse, Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. A federal appeals court on Wednesday, July 17, refused to lift a judge's order temporarily blocking the Biden administration’s new Title IX rule meant to expand protections for LGBTQ+ students
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A divided federal appeals court refused to block an Ohio school district’s rules that bar students from using pronouns that misgender their classmates. The policy, the court said, likely does not violate the First Amendment rights of students with religious beliefs that there is no such thing as a gender transition.

“Transgender students experience the use of non-preferred pronouns as dehumanizing and … as a result, the repeated use of such pronouns can have severely negative effects on children and young adults,” said the majority opinion on July 29 by a 2-1 panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in Cincinnati.

The court said the intentional use of preferred or nonpreferred pronouns is speech under the First Amendment, but the policies of the 24,000-student Olentangy school district were likely justified by the need to eliminate disruption and protect transgender students. The court rejected an injunction to block the rules sought by the national group Parents Defending Education on behalf of several district parents who argued that their children should not be required to use pronouns that conflict with their beliefs that there are only two biological-based genders.

“Perhaps the single thing on which the parties agree is that pronouns matter,” said the majority opinion by Judge Jane B. Stranch, an appointee of President Barack Obama. “That is true for transgender students in the district, who experience the use of preferred pronouns as a vital part of affirming their existence and experience the use of non-preferred pronouns as dehumanizing, degrading, and humiliating. It is also true for [the plaintiff] children, whose parents aver that using pronouns inconsistent with a person’s biological sex at birth contradicts their ‘deeply held beliefs’ about the immutability of sex.”

The opinion was joined by Judge Stephanie D. Davis, an appointee of President Joe Biden.

A school district’s rules are interpreted to bar misgendering, but it offers some alternatives

In 2023, the Olentangy district north of Columbus revised several of its policies to add protections against gender-identity discrimination. When a parent asked in an email whether their “devoutly Christian child who believes in two biological genders” would “be forced to use the pronouns that a transgender child identifies with or be subject to reprimand from the district,” a district lawyer responded that a student “purposefully referring to another student by using gendered language they know is contrary to the other student’s identity” would be discrimination under the district’s policies.

Parents Defending Education, which is involved in several similar cases across the country, sued on behalf of several parents in the district, arguing that the policies violated the First Amendment’s free-speech clause by impermissibly compelling speech, regulating speech based on viewpoint and content, and imposing overbroad restrictions on speech.

A federal district court last year denied a preliminary injunction to block the district’s policies. In its July 29 decision in Parents Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District, the 6th Circuit affirmed the lower court.

“Even this limited preliminary injunction record contains evidence of the substantial disruption that repeated, intentional use of non-preferred pronouns to refer to transgender students can cause,” Stranch wrote for the majority.

The court rejected the compelled-speech argument by the plaintiffs, noting that the school district has said no student would be compelled to use pronouns aligning with a transgender student’s gender identity. Instead, the student could use the classmate’s first name or avoid using pronouns altogether, the district said.

The appeals court rejected the viewpoint-discrimination argument because the district’s policies prohibit harassment, misconduct, and other disruptive speech across a variety of categories and it allows students to express the viewpoint that sex is immutable by several means other than “the use of non-preferred pronouns.” For example, the district said in court proceedings that it would allow a student to wear a T-shirt with the message, “Gender is not fluid,” the court said.

Judge Alice M. Batchelder, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, dissented, saying “The First Amendment forbids the district from compelling students to use speech that conveys a message with which they disagree, namely that biology does not determine gender.”

The district’s suggestion that objecting students use no pronouns was “awkward” and “requires the speaker to recognize and accept that gender transition is a real thing.”

“Regardless of whether students can also discuss gender ideology in the abstract—which is also protected speech—the students’ protected speech here is their use of biological pronouns to affirm their own belief that people are either male or female and that a child cannot ‘transition’ from one sex to another,” Batchelder said.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
How Early Adopters of Remote Therapy are Improving IEPs
Learn how schools are using remote therapy to improve IEP compliance & scalability while delivering outcomes comparable to onsite providers.
Content provided by Huddle Up
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
Cohesive Instruction, Connected Schools: Scale Excellence District-Wide with the Right Technology
Ensure all students receive high-quality instruction with a cohesive educational framework. Learn how to empower teachers and leverage technology.
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
How to Use Data to Combat Bullying and Enhance School Safety
Join our webinar to learn how data can help identify bullying, implement effective interventions, & foster student well-being.
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts The New Title IX Regulation and Legal Battles Over It, Explained
The Biden administration's regulation that interprets Title IX to protect LGBTQ+ students faces multiple legal challenges.
5 min read
Claudia Carranza, of Harlingen, hugs her son, Laur Kaufman, 13, at a rally against House Bill 25, a bill that would ban transgender girls from participating in girls school sports, outside the Capitol in Austin, Texas, on Wednesday, Oct. 6, 2021.
Claudia Carranza, of Harlingen, Texas, hugs her son, Laur Kaufman, 13, at a rally for transgender rights in Austin on Oct. 6, 2021. The U.S. Department of Education's new Title IX regulation, which adds gender identity and sexual orientation to the definition of sex discrimination, has been challenged in multiple lawsuits and blocked in 26 states and at individual schools in other states.
Jay Janner/Austin American-Statesman via AP
Law & Courts Court Upholds Injunction on Arizona Transgender Sports Ban for Young Athletes
A federal appeals court upholds an injunction against an Arizona law, allowing two transgender girls to compete on female teams.
3 min read
Arizona State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne, left, a Republican, takes the ceremonial oath of office from Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert Brutinel, right, as wife Carmen Horne, middle, holds the bible in the public inauguration ceremony at the state Capitol in Phoenix, Thursday, Jan. 5, 2023.
Arizona schools chief Tom Horne, left, takes the ceremonial oath of office at the state Capitol in Phoenix in January 2023. The Republican is the lead defendant in a lawsuit filed by two transgender girls challenging the Save Women's Sports Act, which bars transgender women and girls from female sports.
Ross D. Franklin/AP
Law & Courts How Moms for Liberty's Legal Strategy Has Upended Title IX Rules for Schools
The grassroots group's tactic is confounding schools across the country trying to keep up with which Title IX rules apply to them.
7 min read
Moms for Liberty co-founder Tina Descovich speaks before Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump at the Moms for Liberty annual convention in Washington, Friday, Aug. 30, 2024.
Moms for Liberty co-founder Tina Descovich speaks before Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump addressed the group's annual convention in Washington on Aug. 30. One popular session was about Moms for Liberty's lawsuit challenging the Biden administration's Title IX regulation.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Leaves Biden's Title IX Rule Fully Blocked in 26 States
The court's action effectively leaves in place broad injunctions blocking the entire regulation in 26 states and at schools in other states.
5 min read
The Supreme Court building is seen on Thursday, June 13, 2024, in Washington.
The Supreme Court building is seen on Thursday, June 13, 2024, in Washington.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP